GreenArk latest news: industry updates, company news, guides
Existing carbon neutral labels, product carbon footprint reports, carbon credit records, and climate-brand claims should not be copied directly into new Amazon Climate Pledge Friendly materials.
Read more
Amazon Climate Pledge Friendly content should not be treated as a fixed list of certification names. Sellers need to define evidence object, label permission, and product-page wording boundary.
Read more
When one product has both a carbon claim and an energy label, sellers should not merge all documents into one generic green evidence package.
Read more
Many legacy Carbon Neutral Certified articles combine carbon-neutral claim requirements, Amazon CPF expectations, and commercial outcomes. Only the first topic can be handled through evidence. The other two require stric
Read more
GRS, RCS, OCS, Better Cotton, and Cradle to Cradle Certified support different claim types. Start with the target SKU claim, then check the evidence behind it.
Read more
Rainforest Alliance, FSC, OEKO-TEX, EPEAT, and Cradle to Cradle Certified should not be merged into one generic certification list.
Read more
For Amazon CPF preparation, these programs should not be treated as one category. Each supports a different evidence object.
Read more
Many textile sellers still hold legacy bluesign documents, including bluesign PRODUCT, bluesign APPROVED, supplier certificates, fabric statements, and System Partner materials. In 2026, bluesign introduced bluepass as t
Read more
Amazon Vine and Climate Pledge Friendly are different programs. Vine feedback cannot replace sustainability evidence.
Read more
UL ECOLOGO can be relevant for selected cleaning products, sanitary paper, office paper, personal-care products, packaging, electronics and building-related products. It may also appear in sustainability procurement, bui
Read more
Rainforest Alliance related claims should not be treated as a broad sustainability statement. For coffee, tea, cocoa, bananas, spices, nuts, food ingredients, and compound food products, the key review points are product
Read more
PEFC and FSC can both support paper, wood, packaging and printed-product claims, but they are not interchangeable.
Read more
Non-GMO Project Verified and USDA Organic may appear on the same food, supplement, pet-food or personal-care product, but they support different claims.
Read more
For beauty, personal care, household cleaning, and animal care brands, a cruelty-free claim should not be treated as a short marketing line. A reliable claim needs a documented evidence chain: a fixed cut-off date, suppl
Read more
Green Seal can support sustainability claims for certain product categories, but it should not be treated as a universal green label.
Read more
GRS and RCS claims should not be treated as simple recycled-material marketing phrases. Sellers need to check whether the standard, certificate scope, transaction documents, material percentage and current SKU all match.
Read more
Legacy GOTS articles often mix standard explanations, certification process notes, business assumptions, and Amazon CPF expectations. Before using them for product-page copy, sellers should clean up the claim language an
Read more
For Amazon CPF preparation, a GOTS file should not be reduced to one supplier certificate image. Sellers need to check the version, label grade, SC, TC, and SKU wording.
Read more
Fair Trade files are often used for coffee, cocoa, tea, cotton, handicrafts, home goods, and gift products. Before using them for Amazon CPF or sustainability copy, sellers should identify the evidence object.
Read more
Before using Fair Trade USA files for Amazon CPF or sustainability copy, sellers should check whether the file set supports the exact product, ingredient, label, and SKU statement.
Read more