Sustainability certifications and page claims need clear evidence structure, but unverified platform scoring, tiers, or technical systems should not be presented as fact. A safer approach is to organize evidence by topic.

Review principle: evidence can be structured; platform rules should not be invented. Every page claim should trace back to a specific file.

1. Four Evidence Tables to Maintain

Evidence typeCommon filesPage use
Carbon footprintLCA, EPD, CarbonFree, or other carbon filesSupports carbon-related wording
Material originGRS, RCS, GOTS, FSC, supplier filesSupports recycled, organic, or paper-source claims
Packaging efficiencyDimensions, weight, materials, packaging versionsSupports packaging improvement notes
Supply-chain certificatesIssuing body, certificate number, validity, scopeSupports certification facts and customer review

2. Avoid Unverified Scoring Systems

If a platform does not clearly show a scoring, tiering, or technical system on current official pages, customer-facing materials should not present it as fact. Internal evidence tables are useful, but public wording should return to certificate and product scope.

3. How Greenark Can Help

Greenark (Shenzhen) Certification Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. helps clients build carbon footprint, material, packaging, and supply-chain certificate registers, and review the evidence source for each sustainability claim. We do not promise platform tiers, display positions, or commercial outcomes.

Greenark (Shenzhen) Certification Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
www.greenark-sz.com