Here, an “entry point” means a public source where a team can start checking product facts, rules, or evidence. It is not a certification, a marketplace badge, or a promise of a sales outcome. The right evidence depends on the product, market, platform, claim subject, and current applicable requirements.

Working rule: Do not begin with “green,” “eco-friendly,” or “certified.” Break each proposed statement into a product fact, supporting file, scope, and source that another person can check. 绿色方舟(深圳)认证有限公司 recommends indexing evidence by SKU, version, material or formulation, and market.

1. Identify the kind of information you need

Separate five layers: product and packaging facts; environmental-attribute evidence; third-party scheme documents; platform or buyer requirements; and official market rules. A specification sheet, a certificate, a marketplace program page, and a statutory requirement answer different questions and should not be substituted for one another.

2. Eighteen public entry points

Product and platform sources (1–5)

1) Brand product pages: confirm model, version, materials, dimensions, and packaging. 2) Instructions and label artwork: check whether the proposed wording belongs to the exact version. 3) Amazon Sustainability and Climate Pledge Friendly pages: understand how Amazon describes sustainability features and certification information; these pages are not a universal eligibility decision. 4) The target marketplace’s seller help center: locate current category, attribute, and evidence instructions. 5) Buyer or retailer supplier manuals: identify private purchasing requirements, file formats, and product scope.

Claim and methodology sources (6–10)

6) The FTC Green Guides: review boundaries for environmental marketing claims such as recycled content, degradability, and carbon offsets. 7) The European Commission’s Green Claims page: understand the emphasis on comparable, verifiable support and find the EU Ecolabel route. 8) The EU Ecolabel Catalogue: check product groups and licence information instead of extending a material or company claim to the whole product. 9) The ISO/IEC catalogue: confirm the name, edition, and object of a standard; a catalogue entry is not a certificate. 10) The scheme owner’s rules and claims policy: verify permitted marks, wording, scope, and authorization conditions.

Certification and supply-chain sources (11–14)

11) A certification body’s public certificate search: check certificate number, legal holder, product or site scope, and status. 12) An accreditation directory: check the accredited scope of a certification body or laboratory; accreditation does not mean every service is covered. 13) Textile Exchange standards and chain-of-custody materials: distinguish standard objects, Scope Certificates, and Transaction Certificates for GRS, RCS, OCS, GOTS, and related schemes. 14) The supplier’s original file set: retain signed PDFs, tested model or sample, batch, purchasing, and delivery records; a verbal statement is only a lead to verify.

Market-rule and data sources (15–18)

15) The competent authority for the target market: check applicable rules, guidance, annexes, and update notices. 16) Customs or product-classification databases: use HS or CN codes as classification clues, then confirm against product facts and the applicable rule. 17) Packaging, material, and production ledgers: record weight, composition, origin, batch, supplier, and changes. 18) An internal evidence index and version log: connect claim, SKU, file, source, and review date, with the original link and reviewer.

3. Turn a source into a bounded page statement

First lock the SKU, version, material or formulation, packaging, and market. Next assign a file and original source to each proposed statement. Then compare legal entity, scope, model, batch, version, and status. Finally write a specific fact with its limitation. For example, “the package contains X% recycled plastic” requires the matching packaging version and calculation basis; it does not support an unqualified claim that the entire product is environmentally preferable.

4. Boundaries that should remain visible

A marketplace feature is not a statutory compliance certificate. A company certificate does not automatically cover every SKU. A material or supplier report does not automatically cover the finished product, packaging, and market. Public sources help locate evidence; they do not replace a regulator, marketplace, or scheme owner’s formal decision. Avoid unsupported statements such as “100% eco-friendly,” “guaranteed approval,” “guaranteed traffic,” or automatic delisting or customs outcomes.

5. Minimum fields for the evidence index

Keep the proposed wording, claim subject, SKU/model/version, file name and issuer, certificate or report number, market, scope limitation, original source, review date, change record, and open gaps. For environmental claims, prefer a specific statement with visible qualifications that can be traced back to a file. This page is an information-organizing reference, not legal advice for a particular product or market.

Source starting points

FTC Green Guides; European Commission Green Claims; EU Ecolabel; Textile Exchange Standards; Amazon Climate Pledge Friendly. Pages and scheme rules can change, so return to the original source before relying on them.